Therefore the normal reaction from a young-Earth viewpoint would be to declare that radiometric relationship is inaccurate or untrustworthy.
Regrettably, although the young-Earthers are very very very long on critique, these are generally quick on help. It’s not hard to assert that radiometric practices do not work, but it is quite another plain thing to prove it. This the young-Earth creationist regularly does not do.
I’m maybe not likely to you will need to write a web-treatise on radiometric dating myself, because much better qualified writers have previously done a far greater work than i really could. It is a range of resources, some on line, some maybe maybe not, and this can be consulted by anyone thinking about learning more about how radiometric relationship is completed, or in giving an answer to arguments criticising dating that is radiometric. My purpose is always to show, through these resources that young-Earth creationist criticisms of radiometric relationship are insufficient at the best. Provided that radiometric relationship appears as scientifically valid, then your assertion of the young-Earth is falsified by direct observation. The argument from radiometriic relationship may be the strongest medical argument that could be taken to keep with this problem, for me.